In the News » Sampling of Published Court Decisions

Continental Orthopedic Appliances, Inc. v. H.I.P., 40 F. Supp.2d 109 (E.D.N.Y. 1999)

Jan 15, 1999

Suppliers of orthopedic and prosthetic (O&P) devices sued two suppliers and health maintenance organization (HMO), claiming that exclusive dealing agreement under which HMO agreed to approve O&P devices only from two suppliers violated federal and state antitrust laws. Defendants moved to dismiss. The District Court, Spatt, J., held that: (1) exclusive dealing agreement was not per se violation of Sherman Act prohibition of contracts, combinations or conspiracies in restraint of trade; (2) for purposes of determining whether antitrust claim was stated, relevant market would be deemed to include all health maintenance organizations within 11 county area; and (3) purchaser of assets of favored O&P supplier was included in suit.

Read the full opinion (PDF)


In the News
We believe our detailed preparation and reputation for creativity and aggressiveness often have an influence on opponents when employing a means of alternative dispute resolution.